The statement "voting will help candidates reflect citizens' interests" best responds to citizens who do not vote because they feel that no political candidates speak for them.
An election is a process of choosing who represents the common people. This means that, in a democracy, the public cast their votes to choose who represents them in the governing body of the country.
- Voting is done among the general public to allow them a free voice to choose who they want to be represented by.
- This means that each voter has the right to choose the candidate they believe is best suited for their interest.
- But in cases where the voter thinks no candidate can speak or represent them, then the voter can abstain from casting his/her vote.
- When this happens, it usually is because the voter feels none of the candidates resonate with his/her belief.
- Moreover, if the voter refuses to vote instead of choosing one candidate even though he/she did not support the candidate, then there can be a general understanding that voting will help candidates understand what the citizens want.
- If the candidates can see the 'missing/abstained votes', then it can make the impression that the available candidates do not have the same interest as the voter(s).
During elections, the main idea was to select the candidate that best represents the interest of the citizens as a whole. But if a candidate refuses to vote, or doesn't vote for anyone, it would mean that none of the candidates have the same interest that he/she wants. And the refusal to cast votes means no candidate is suitable to represent the people. Thus, this shows that voting helps candidates understand and see what the interests of the citizens are. Thus, the correct answer is option B.
Learn more about elections here: